“Knowledge is shared and makes everyone look at their work process!” An experience report based on reflective portfolios

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18310/2446-4813.2025v11nsup5.4602

Keywords:

Teaching, Problem-Based Learning, Health Personnel, Education, Graduate

Abstract

Active teaching-learning methodologies (MAEA) are characterized by valuing student participation in the construction of knowledge, making the learning process more autonomous, dialogical, contextualized and with the potential to transform reality. This paper is an experience report, with a qualitative approach, constructed by five master degree students and two professors from the Postgraduate Program in Clinical Management at the Federal University of São Carlos (PPGGC/UFSCar) who experienced a mandatory theoretical discipline called Curricular Activity of Educational Processes in Health (ACPES) in 2022. Objectives: Describe and analyze experiences and learning developed by master degree students at ACPES, through reflective portfolios constructed by the students themselves. Briefing of Experience: The methodological path had four moments: survey of documents related to ACPES and the portfolios of the five student authors; individual construction of a conceptual map about the experiences and significant transformations that occurred as a result of ACPES; selection of the three most evident and representative sets of experiences identified in the portfolios; and elaboration of a single conceptual map, bringing together the three sets of senses, meanings and values in relation to experiences, based on visualization in meaning cores. The analysis of the portfolios was guided by the theoretical frameworks of constructivism and resulted in three distinct categories: 1) Individual learning; 2) Learning in interpersonal relationships; and 3) Transformations in professional practice. It was observed that the process experienced in the AC produced motivation, responsibility, criticality, reflexivity and autonomy from an individual point of view. In the field of interpersonal relationships, the richness of diversity, construction of a space of empathy and acceptance for the consolidation of collaborative learning stand out. The transformations in professional practice are the highlight of this work, which reports actions to qualify the work processes of master's students. Conclusions: The organized and expressed subjectivities produced reflections on the MAEA that retrace previous theories in each discourse, rebuilding what we know as Active Methodologies and their potential to transform reality.

References

1. Alves SM, Teo CRPA. O ativo das metodologias ativas: contribuições da teoria histórico-cultural para os processos de ensinar e aprender na educação superior. Educ Rev [Internet]. 2020;36:e229610. doi:10.1590/0102-4698229619.

2. Feliciano AB, Aquilante AG, Souto BGA, Rocha SR, Sampaio SF, Bleicher T. Gestão da Clínica: Caderno do curso. 1ª Ed. São Carlos: UFSCar/CPOI; 2020. 60 p.

3. Lima VV. Espiral construtivista: uma metodologia ativa de ensino-aprendizagem. Interface Com Saude Educ [Internet]. 2016;21(61):421–34. doi:10.1590/1807-57622016.0316.

4. da Silva RF, Sá-Chaves I. Formação reflexiva: representações dos professores acerca do uso de portfólio reflexivo na formação de médicos e enfermeiros. Interface Com Saude Educ. 2008;12(27):721–34. doi:10.1590/S1414-32832008000400004.

5. Larrosa Bondía L. Notas sobre a experiência e o saber de experiência. Rev Bras Educ. 2002;19:20-28. doi:10.1590/S1413-24782002000100003.

6. Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 14ª Ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2014.

7. Bosi MLM. Paradigmas, tradições e terminologias: demarcações necessárias. Em: Bosi MLM, Gastaldo D, organizadores. Tópicos avançados em pesquisa qualitativa em saúde: fundamentos teórico-metodológicos. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes; 2021. p. 106-44.

8. Luna WF, Nordi AB de A, Rached KS, de Carvalho ARV. Projeto de Extensão Iandé Guatá: vivências de estudantes de Medicina com indígenas Potiguara. Interface Com Saude Educ. 2019;23:e180576. doi:10.1590/Interface.180576.

9. Ausubel D, Novak JD, Hanesian H. Psicologia educacional. Rio de Janeiro: Interamericana; 1980.

10. Moreira MA. Aprendizagem significativa. Brasília: UnB; 1998.

11. Machin R, Paulino DB, de Pontes JC, Rodrigues RRN. Diversidade e diferença: desafios para a formação dos profissionais de saúde. Cienc Saude Colet [Internet]. 2022;27:3797–806. doi:10.1590/1413-812320222710.07332022.

12. Borges MC, Miranda CH, Santana RC, Bollela VR. Avaliação formativa e feedback como ferramenta de aprendizado na formação de profissionais da saúde. Med (Ribeirão Preto). 2014;47(3):324–31. doi:10.11606/issn.2176-7262.v47i3p324-331.

13. Conterno S de FR, Lopes RE. Pressupostos pedagógicos das atuais propostas de formação superior em saúde no Brasil: origens históricas e fundamentos teóricos. Avaliacao Rev Avaliacao Educ Sup (Campinas). 2016;21(3):993–1016. doi:10.1590/S1414-40772016000300016.

14. Chianca-Neves MGB, Lauer-Leite ID, Priante PT. As concepções de preceptores do Sus sobre metodologias ativas na formação do profissional da saúde. Educ Rev. 2020;36:e207303. doi:10.1590/0102-4698207303.

15. Iglesias A, Garcia DC, Pralon JA, Badaró-Moreira MI. Educação Permanente no Sistema Único de Saúde: concepções de profissionais da gestão e dos serviços. Psicol Cienc Profis [Internet]. 2023;43:e255126. doi:10.1590/1982-3703003255126.

Published

2025-11-12

How to Cite

Dudienas Dovidauskas, K., Rego Rangel Cabral , B., de Rocco Guimarães, A., Carneiro Cruz, M. C., Braga Reis, F. C., Fernandes Luna, W., & Aquilante, A. G. (2025). “Knowledge is shared and makes everyone look at their work process!” An experience report based on reflective portfolios. Saúde Em Redes, 11(sup5), 4602. https://doi.org/10.18310/2446-4813.2025v11nsup5.4602